The call came as delegates meet this week to resume negotiations on the Arms Treaty (ATT), a legally-binding treaty to regulate the global Arms. 

 

Last week Amnesty International revealed how a Leicestershire company may have supplied Colonel Gaddafi’s Libyan government forces with armoured crowd control vehicles used to crush protests in which as many as 200 people have reportedly been killed. The organisation highlighted the pressing need for strong international export controls to prevent weapons, munitions and related equipment ending up in the hands of human rights abusers. 

 

Executive director of Amnesty International Morocco Salah Abdellaoui said:

 

“The killings and injuring of peaceful demonstrators in the Middle East and North Africa show the urgent need for stringent controls on a wide range of arms that are likely to harm innocent citizens. Governments of arms producing countries need to understand that people will no longer accept the free-for-all in selling their weapons to leaders who have no shame in using them against their own citizens.” 

 

Top of the agenda will be discussions around the criteria against which transfers of arms should either be authorised or denied. Campaigners stress that if there is a substantial risk that weapons, munitions or related equipment will be used for serious human rights violations, the sale of arms should not be authorised. 

 

Campaigners have welcomed the UN Security Council’s decision to impose a strong arms embargo on Libya, which includes a wide range of weapons, ammunition, equipment and types of transfers. In order to avoid further such tragedies, the world urgently needs a preventive tool. 

 

Oliver Sprague of Amnesty International’s delegation added: 

 

“It’s more important than ever that UN member states ensure that the Arms Treaty will build on this important precedent.”

 

Governments will be discussing what should be part of an ATT. Control Arms campaigners stress that all weapons, munitions and related equipment – from armoured vehicles, missiles and aircraft through to small arms, grenades and ammunition – for the use of force in military, police and internal security operations enforcement must be covered if the Treaty is to be effective in saving lives and preventing grave human rights abuses. 

The importance of international cooperation and the need for assistance amongst countries to make the treaty work effectively will also be on the ‘to-do’ list of negotiators. 

 

Anna Macdonald of Oxfam said: 

 

“The time where our governments and companies could operate without any legally-binding rules is coming to an end. It is ridiculous that there are Treaties to regulate the sale of everything from dinosaur bones to postage stamps, but not deadly weapons. Those who export arms irresponsibly need to know their trading days are numbered. It’s time to put the Arms under control.”

 

One person every minute dies as a result of armed violence, with thousands more injured and abused every day, according to estimates of the Control Arms Campaign, an international network of civil society from around the world. 

 

Baffour Amoa of the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) said: 

 

“We hope that this week we will see the development of a Treaty text laying out in detail what common standards governments will have to implement in future. It is vital that this happens considering that we are halfway through the negotiations and there is not a lot of time left.”

 

There are currently no comprehensive, legally binding international rules governing the trade in conventional arms, and gaps and loopholes in regional and national controls allow guns, bullets, tanks, missiles and rockets to end up in conflict zones and in the hands of those who commit war crimes, grave human rights abuses and other systemic forms of armed violence.